Common alternatives — and why they're not ideal for protected documentation.
ManualHQ vs. common alternatives in direct comparison.
| Feature |
ManualHQ
|
SharePoint | Google Drive | Confluence | Self-hosted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDF upload + chapter detection | |||||
| Chapter-level access | |||||
| Protected online viewer | |||||
| Watermarked downloads | |||||
| GDPR-compliant audit log | |||||
| Invitation system (email link) | |||||
| No uncontrolled downloads | |||||
| 2FA (TOTP + backup codes) | |||||
| REST API with OpenAPI spec | |||||
| No IT department needed | |||||
| GDPR: Servers in Germany | |||||
| From 29 EUR/month |
Built for a single purpose: securely delivering your documentation.
Chapters are automatically detected. No converting, no reformatting.
Chapter-level access with expiry dates. Revocable at any time.
No uncontrolled downloads. PDFs are displayed in the browser.
Every download carries the recipient's name. Transparently traceable.
Servers in Germany. Audit log. No data sharing with third parties.
Programmatically manage documents, access, and invitations.